<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Camfrog Facebook Fan Page</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.camfrog.com/2009/05/06/camfrog-facebook-fan-page/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.camfrog.com/2009/05/06/camfrog-facebook-fan-page/</link>
	<description>The Official Camfrog Video Chat Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 19:12:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: brian mcahon</title>
		<link>http://blog.camfrog.com/2009/05/06/camfrog-facebook-fan-page/comment-page-1/#comment-31961</link>
		<dc:creator>brian mcahon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 10:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.camfrog.com/?p=349#comment-31961</guid>
		<description>cannot access camfog to sig on 12 hrs now    deleted 5.3 reinstalled  even deleted and reinstalled 5.2 still have yahoo msg   mesg msg  cucme mesg all work but cant connect to camfrog server it just spins and spins  please help</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cannot access camfog to sig on 12 hrs now    deleted 5.3 reinstalled  even deleted and reinstalled 5.2 still have yahoo msg   mesg msg  cucme mesg all work but cant connect to camfrog server it just spins and spins  please help</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zoomshorts</title>
		<link>http://blog.camfrog.com/2009/05/06/camfrog-facebook-fan-page/comment-page-1/#comment-28619</link>
		<dc:creator>Zoomshorts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 13:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.camfrog.com/?p=349#comment-28619</guid>
		<description>&quot;Camfrog fans have already made Camfrog fan pages on these sites anyway, so we thought it was important to make it clear what fan pages are official and really owned by Camfrog.&quot;

I can understand that.  It makes sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Camfrog fans have already made Camfrog fan pages on these sites anyway, so we thought it was important to make it clear what fan pages are official and really owned by Camfrog.&#8221;</p>
<p>I can understand that.  It makes sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dalnet</title>
		<link>http://blog.camfrog.com/2009/05/06/camfrog-facebook-fan-page/comment-page-1/#comment-28467</link>
		<dc:creator>Dalnet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 22:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.camfrog.com/?p=349#comment-28467</guid>
		<description>Yes its nice Facebook Camfrog Grup! mean Cambo_Ok.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes its nice Facebook Camfrog Grup! mean Cambo_Ok.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: visidh</title>
		<link>http://blog.camfrog.com/2009/05/06/camfrog-facebook-fan-page/comment-page-1/#comment-28463</link>
		<dc:creator>visidh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 22:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.camfrog.com/?p=349#comment-28463</guid>
		<description>I CAN,T UNDERSTAND WHY I AM DISABLE FROM 2 DAYS WITH OUT DOING ANY WRONG GESTURE, I HAVE NOT USE BAD LANGUAGE EVER .,.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I CAN,T UNDERSTAND WHY I AM DISABLE FROM 2 DAYS WITH OUT DOING ANY WRONG GESTURE, I HAVE NOT USE BAD LANGUAGE EVER .,.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://blog.camfrog.com/2009/05/06/camfrog-facebook-fan-page/comment-page-1/#comment-28429</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 14:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.camfrog.com/?p=349#comment-28429</guid>
		<description>We plan to bring new discussion features in the future.  There is no requirement to join Twitter or Facebook, but it may be fun to join our groups on these services if you already use them and you are looking for your Camfrog fix.

Camfrog fans have already made Camfrog fan pages on these sites anyway, so we thought it was important to make it clear what fan pages are official and really owned by Camfrog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We plan to bring new discussion features in the future.  There is no requirement to join Twitter or Facebook, but it may be fun to join our groups on these services if you already use them and you are looking for your Camfrog fix.</p>
<p>Camfrog fans have already made Camfrog fan pages on these sites anyway, so we thought it was important to make it clear what fan pages are official and really owned by Camfrog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zoomshorts</title>
		<link>http://blog.camfrog.com/2009/05/06/camfrog-facebook-fan-page/comment-page-1/#comment-28423</link>
		<dc:creator>Zoomshorts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 13:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.camfrog.com/?p=349#comment-28423</guid>
		<description>Having &#039;sister&#039; sites on places Camfrog has no control over is, in my opinion, less than desireable.

Camfrog already shows an &#039;anti-phishing&#039;/Unsafe Site warning when we click on links. Why are you allowing third party sites? Why not simply bring back the Camfrog Forums and make a few areas of interest for the users? Tech support, news and the like? I realize the &#039;blog&#039; is something like that, but it is not as all-encompassing as it should have been from the beginning. Bots and software installs from unsecure sites should be a main concern for Camfrog. Are you going to constantly monitor the Facebook, Myspace et al ,sites for SPAM and other dangers??

It seems like too much work with too many security disadvantages. Is it just me who thinks this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having &#8216;sister&#8217; sites on places Camfrog has no control over is, in my opinion, less than desireable.</p>
<p>Camfrog already shows an &#8216;anti-phishing&#8217;/Unsafe Site warning when we click on links. Why are you allowing third party sites? Why not simply bring back the Camfrog Forums and make a few areas of interest for the users? Tech support, news and the like? I realize the &#8216;blog&#8217; is something like that, but it is not as all-encompassing as it should have been from the beginning. Bots and software installs from unsecure sites should be a main concern for Camfrog. Are you going to constantly monitor the Facebook, Myspace et al ,sites for SPAM and other dangers??</p>
<p>It seems like too much work with too many security disadvantages. Is it just me who thinks this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

