<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Camfrog Client 1.7.2806 (Mac OS X) Released</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.camfrog.com/2008/10/22/camfrog-client-172806-mac-os-x-released/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.camfrog.com/2008/10/22/camfrog-client-172806-mac-os-x-released/</link>
	<description>The Official Camfrog Video Chat Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 19:12:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DXMachina</title>
		<link>http://blog.camfrog.com/2008/10/22/camfrog-client-172806-mac-os-x-released/comment-page-1/#comment-6282</link>
		<dc:creator>DXMachina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 22:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.camfrog.com/?p=159#comment-6282</guid>
		<description>camfrog 1.7 crashes a few seconds after joining a room - any room. where can I re-download camfrog 1.6? it worked flawlessly

Cam OSX 10.4.11, PowerPC G4</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>camfrog 1.7 crashes a few seconds after joining a room &#8211; any room. where can I re-download camfrog 1.6? it worked flawlessly</p>
<p>Cam OSX 10.4.11, PowerPC G4</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://blog.camfrog.com/2008/10/22/camfrog-client-172806-mac-os-x-released/comment-page-1/#comment-6001</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 23:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.camfrog.com/?p=159#comment-6001</guid>
		<description>this version is a wreck, stream loads are quick then bottleneck after a minute. it makes it seem like everyone is feeding the server pre recorded vids that pixellate by nature. the room loads are the same, they used to come up robust and stable now it&#039;s as if a page fires up with a bunch of preliminary code being munched before you aquire a user list and the only sure stream is the first you click on, any stream after that has latency. that&#039;s really the keyword for this version &quot;hella latency&quot;. it&#039;s a botch and i think alot of people will leave. it&#039;s a neat way to alleviate server strain and bandwidth, but a program doesn&#039;t have to shoot itself in the foot to shave off it&#039;s user query baggage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this version is a wreck, stream loads are quick then bottleneck after a minute. it makes it seem like everyone is feeding the server pre recorded vids that pixellate by nature. the room loads are the same, they used to come up robust and stable now it&#8217;s as if a page fires up with a bunch of preliminary code being munched before you aquire a user list and the only sure stream is the first you click on, any stream after that has latency. that&#8217;s really the keyword for this version &#8220;hella latency&#8221;. it&#8217;s a botch and i think alot of people will leave. it&#8217;s a neat way to alleviate server strain and bandwidth, but a program doesn&#8217;t have to shoot itself in the foot to shave off it&#8217;s user query baggage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jona</title>
		<link>http://blog.camfrog.com/2008/10/22/camfrog-client-172806-mac-os-x-released/comment-page-1/#comment-4927</link>
		<dc:creator>Jona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 14:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.camfrog.com/?p=159#comment-4927</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m too experienceing the washed out on the cams, its very frustrating to say the least, im just looking around now for an older version :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m too experienceing the washed out on the cams, its very frustrating to say the least, im just looking around now for an older version <img src='http://blog.camfrog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zorg</title>
		<link>http://blog.camfrog.com/2008/10/22/camfrog-client-172806-mac-os-x-released/comment-page-1/#comment-3801</link>
		<dc:creator>Zorg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 20:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.camfrog.com/?p=159#comment-3801</guid>
		<description>Camfrog 1.7 crashes when it tries to load my UVC webcam (XBox Live Vision) either when joining a chatroom or opening Preferences. Camfrog 1.6 works perfectly with the same setup. (G5 with Leopard 10.5.5.) A workaround I found was to load CamTwist (a free cam effects program) first, then Camfrog. As others have mentioned, the new Camfrog also messes with the gamma and ignores its own video preferences. The result is a washed-out image. I have gone back to Camfrog 1.6 until this is fixed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Camfrog 1.7 crashes when it tries to load my UVC webcam (XBox Live Vision) either when joining a chatroom or opening Preferences. Camfrog 1.6 works perfectly with the same setup. (G5 with Leopard 10.5.5.) A workaround I found was to load CamTwist (a free cam effects program) first, then Camfrog. As others have mentioned, the new Camfrog also messes with the gamma and ignores its own video preferences. The result is a washed-out image. I have gone back to Camfrog 1.6 until this is fixed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paolo</title>
		<link>http://blog.camfrog.com/2008/10/22/camfrog-client-172806-mac-os-x-released/comment-page-1/#comment-3532</link>
		<dc:creator>paolo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 10:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.camfrog.com/?p=159#comment-3532</guid>
		<description>Hi a suggestion: It would be nice to have the possibility to resize the window &quot;Video Chat Room List&quot;.

thank for your best work

Paolo lovat</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi a suggestion: It would be nice to have the possibility to resize the window &#8220;Video Chat Room List&#8221;.</p>
<p>thank for your best work</p>
<p>Paolo lovat</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nighthawks101</title>
		<link>http://blog.camfrog.com/2008/10/22/camfrog-client-172806-mac-os-x-released/comment-page-1/#comment-3518</link>
		<dc:creator>nighthawks101</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 01:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.camfrog.com/?p=159#comment-3518</guid>
		<description>I noticed the brightness in this version too, and the settings in the media tab or preferences didn&#039;t seem to fix it. 
Also, I liked the way sorting worked in 1.6 much better. Can you bring back the old way to sort? 
Finally, it would be nice to have the lurkers as an option. I would rather be able to see everyone in the room without having to scroll down to the bottom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed the brightness in this version too, and the settings in the media tab or preferences didn&#8217;t seem to fix it.<br />
Also, I liked the way sorting worked in 1.6 much better. Can you bring back the old way to sort?<br />
Finally, it would be nice to have the lurkers as an option. I would rather be able to see everyone in the room without having to scroll down to the bottom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://blog.camfrog.com/2008/10/22/camfrog-client-172806-mac-os-x-released/comment-page-1/#comment-3312</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.camfrog.com/?p=159#comment-3312</guid>
		<description>All the cameras, local and remote look really bright compared to previous versions. I&#039;ve tried it on 3 seperate systems with the same results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All the cameras, local and remote look really bright compared to previous versions. I&#8217;ve tried it on 3 seperate systems with the same results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

