Comments on: Camfrog for Windows Mobile Beta

By: matt

matt — Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:47:31 +0000

It would be nice if you guys had a Apple Iphone or Itouch for camfrog aswell

By: chris

chris — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 12:46:56 +0000

Camfrog mobile works fine on my Samsung Omnia but if only it had video, it would be amazing. There’s a massive gap in the market for mobile video, even Skype haven’t come out with a version yet.

By: Ember75

Ember75 — Mon, 30 Mar 2009 06:18:59 +0000

“Helia Says:
September 26th, 2008 at 12:44 pm
Ok this is great BUT why not make it so any cell phone can use it think that would be great and everyone would love it”

QUOTED FOR TRUTH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

( blackberry storm user here and I KNOW this would be sexy on my phone !) P.S. did I mention that it would DEFINATELY help advertise cf on a MUCH larger scale ? I wonder what would happen if I used it in a club/bar/coffee house on my storm out here in wonderful Los Angeles…. how many people would want to pick this up? I think its something that should be ported over to other systems or @ least a work around for those that have something else than windows.

By: Renard

Renard — Sun, 01 Feb 2009 09:14:32 +0000

Pls introduce this for the Iphone.

By: 4nthony

4nthony — Sat, 15 Nov 2008 21:27:09 +0000

Windows mobile is amazing

the problesm faced have been listed already above but it is so nice to work with.

i would like to see room access but only for text interaction. i understand the boundrys you face in america. in europ we do not have these restrictions as they put high charges on software that dose not fall into packages pre defind but room text would be a realy cool to have so you can still talk in a room. maybe only when you activate your pro code
Would be cool.

Anyway great work and nice features

Anthony

By: fbigrzes

fbigrzes — Wed, 29 Oct 2008 06:03:00 +0000

camfrog mobile sony ericsson k550i java???.jar????????????????????????

By: Cr42yn3ts74k3rs5

Cr42yn3ts74k3rs5 — Mon, 29 Sep 2008 20:04:39 +0000

It is awesome but as Vivo say what about Blackberry?? what about sidekick? I have notice many deaf people have sidekick but why not install Camfrog there which will be VERY high popular and better service?

By: VIVO

VIVO — Mon, 29 Sep 2008 01:40:59 +0000

Amazing… how about Blackberry?
I am sure Millions of Blackberry users will need it too

Smile

By: Adrian

Adrian — Sun, 28 Sep 2008 21:44:16 +0000

Another comment (sorry for the multiple posts), on the screenname that has 1000 users in the buddy list, switching between “show offline users” on and off also takes 10 minutes. So it definitely seems like the whole buddy list is being loaded into the phone, which is unnecessary for most people since only about 10% of a person’s buddy list is actually online at any one time. Just make it so that the camfrog server online communicates online users to the phone, not the whole buddy list.

By: Adrian

Adrian — Sun, 28 Sep 2008 21:33:14 +0000

One extra note/suggestion, if you want to reduce load time for people with large buddy lists, consider leaving the buddy list on the central server and only sending usernames of ONLINE people to the cell phone. From what I can tell, it seems that the program is taking all one thousand screen names, and then deciding who is online/offline, which takes forever. If for whatever reason people want to want to see a full list offline people too, give the option to load those users afterwards, with an explicit warning saying something like “Attempting to show all users may take over 10 minutes. Are you sure you want Camfrog Mobile to load your complete buddy list?”