<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Camfrog 3.X Blocked</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.camfrog.com/2008/08/11/camfrog-3x-blocked/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.camfrog.com/2008/08/11/camfrog-3x-blocked/</link>
	<description>The Official Camfrog Video Chat Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 19:12:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: benji</title>
		<link>http://blog.camfrog.com/2008/08/11/camfrog-3x-blocked/comment-page-1/#comment-968</link>
		<dc:creator>benji</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 11:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.camfrog.com/?p=119#comment-968</guid>
		<description>hi in this version sound seems like its very tiny  and on cam text the letters are hitting each outher</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi in this version sound seems like its very tiny  and on cam text the letters are hitting each outher</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VIVO</title>
		<link>http://blog.camfrog.com/2008/08/11/camfrog-3x-blocked/comment-page-1/#comment-932</link>
		<dc:creator>VIVO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 07:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.camfrog.com/?p=119#comment-932</guid>
		<description>CF 5.1 looks good, heavy program and eat more resource memory.

CF 5.1  with Default Video Window Size configurations:

Classic 1×1
Medium 1×1.5
Large 1×2
Extra Large 1×2.5
Ultra Large 1.x3

WHY NOT can we add one more option into  Default Video Window Size configuration:

&quot;Small 1×0.5&quot;  for future next generation??

Greetzz
VIVO</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CF 5.1 looks good, heavy program and eat more resource memory.</p>
<p>CF 5.1  with Default Video Window Size configurations:</p>
<p>Classic 1×1<br />
Medium 1×1.5<br />
Large 1×2<br />
Extra Large 1×2.5<br />
Ultra Large 1.x3</p>
<p>WHY NOT can we add one more option into  Default Video Window Size configuration:</p>
<p>&#8220;Small 1×0.5&#8243;  for future next generation??</p>
<p>Greetzz<br />
VIVO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: notknow</title>
		<link>http://blog.camfrog.com/2008/08/11/camfrog-3x-blocked/comment-page-1/#comment-929</link>
		<dc:creator>notknow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 21:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.camfrog.com/?p=119#comment-929</guid>
		<description>Hey,

ooooh noooo because my friend it is slow CPU too bandwith.... 5.1 is very slow webcam.... him is stop camfrog.... but too other people if slow cpu or bandwither all must stop leave to camfrog 5.1.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey,</p>
<p>ooooh noooo because my friend it is slow CPU too bandwith&#8230;. 5.1 is very slow webcam&#8230;. him is stop camfrog&#8230;. but too other people if slow cpu or bandwither all must stop leave to camfrog 5.1&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: inimitablo</title>
		<link>http://blog.camfrog.com/2008/08/11/camfrog-3x-blocked/comment-page-1/#comment-928</link>
		<dc:creator>inimitablo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 20:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.camfrog.com/?p=119#comment-928</guid>
		<description>Lately camfrog requires much  speed that in the beginnings in the 2003, truth?

Up-to-date version works very well...congratulations to camshare!


David.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lately camfrog requires much  speed that in the beginnings in the 2003, truth?</p>
<p>Up-to-date version works very well&#8230;congratulations to camshare!</p>
<p>David.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mistaagress</title>
		<link>http://blog.camfrog.com/2008/08/11/camfrog-3x-blocked/comment-page-1/#comment-923</link>
		<dc:creator>mistaagress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.camfrog.com/?p=119#comment-923</guid>
		<description>Well done

one Stream less to must send up ...jihaaa

i love cf 5.1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well done</p>
<p>one Stream less to must send up &#8230;jihaaa</p>
<p>i love cf 5.1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

