Comments on: 5.0 Video Window Size & Screen Space http://blog.camfrog.com/2008/04/30/50-video-window-size-screen-space/ The Official Camfrog Video Chat Blog Mon, 06 Feb 2012 19:12:35 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: mistaagress http://blog.camfrog.com/2008/04/30/50-video-window-size-screen-space/comment-page-1/#comment-124 mistaagress Wed, 07 May 2008 06:16:03 +0000 http://blog.camfrog.com/?p=15#comment-124 well .. i hope in next update of client an option to disable super mode for users with lower bandwith. Many dsl 2000 users cannot talk in my room because the traffic is too much for his connectionspeed well .. i hope in next update of client an option to disable super mode for
users with lower bandwith. Many dsl 2000 users cannot talk in my room because the traffic is too much for his connectionspeed

]]> By: Strikr http://blog.camfrog.com/2008/04/30/50-video-window-size-screen-space/comment-page-1/#comment-107 Strikr Mon, 05 May 2008 05:50:43 +0000 http://blog.camfrog.com/?p=15#comment-107 Dear Camfrog, The issue I have with the new camfrog 5.0 is the video feature. Coming from a user and hoster point of view some people would say it is a good thing but if I go in a room with many users and would like to open 30+ cams I would not be able to because of the size. Also if I host a room with 40+ and they all the recommended or super setting. This is going to eat the bandwidth as we do not have the small feature anymore which was problably the most liked setting for Operators and some users. I would also like to note that I believe Camfrog 3.94 was/is the best version there is. The only big issue is not having sound when you enter a room from a private conversation. It is a shame that all these good settings are lost. Dear Camfrog,

The issue I have with the new camfrog 5.0 is the video feature. Coming from a user and hoster point of view some people would say it is a good thing but if I go in a room with many users and would like to open 30+ cams I would not be able to because of the size.

Also if I host a room with 40+ and they all the recommended or super setting. This is going to eat the bandwidth as we do not have the small feature anymore which was problably the most liked setting for Operators and some users.

I would also like to note that I believe Camfrog 3.94 was/is the best version there is. The only big issue is not having sound when you enter a room from a private conversation. It is a shame that all these good settings are lost.

]]> By: Oliver http://blog.camfrog.com/2008/04/30/50-video-window-size-screen-space/comment-page-1/#comment-69 Oliver Fri, 02 May 2008 16:56:31 +0000 http://blog.camfrog.com/?p=15#comment-69 The main reason I didn't upgrade yet (and probably won't unless forced to) is because Camfrog 5.0 still doesn't have cam stickyness. I'm still on 3.94, and like many other Camfrog users I'm very picky about my cam organization. The vertical/horizontal/vertical+horizonal auto-organizing simply doesn't fit my needs. I need to be able to anchor my own webcam somewhere on the screen (I always maximize the chat room window, and put my own cam in the top right, but not covering the userlist) and be able to "stick" cams I open to my own cam quickly and perfectly symmetrically aligned. With any Camfrog version above 3.94, there is no stickyness, and unless I do some surgical precision cam placement, it always looks sloppy. I guess I'm just picky, but it would be nice to use that feature again. The main reason I didn’t upgrade yet (and probably won’t unless forced to) is because Camfrog 5.0 still doesn’t have cam stickyness. I’m still on 3.94, and like many other Camfrog users I’m very picky about my cam organization. The vertical/horizontal/vertical+horizonal auto-organizing simply doesn’t fit my needs. I need to be able to anchor my own webcam somewhere on the screen (I always maximize the chat room window, and put my own cam in the top right, but not covering the userlist) and be able to “stick” cams I open to my own cam quickly and perfectly symmetrically aligned. With any Camfrog version above 3.94, there is no stickyness, and unless I do some surgical precision cam placement, it always looks sloppy. I guess I’m just picky, but it would be nice to use that feature again.

]]> By: AnTi_RaCisTe http://blog.camfrog.com/2008/04/30/50-video-window-size-screen-space/comment-page-1/#comment-66 AnTi_RaCisTe Thu, 01 May 2008 19:58:01 +0000 http://blog.camfrog.com/?p=15#comment-66 super Vertion de camfrog bravo .. (Good Work) super Vertion de camfrog bravo .. (Good Work)

]]> By: KID_SI_REN_ZER http://blog.camfrog.com/2008/04/30/50-video-window-size-screen-space/comment-page-1/#comment-58 KID_SI_REN_ZER Thu, 01 May 2008 06:08:35 +0000 http://blog.camfrog.com/?p=15#comment-58 why not see webcam why not see webcam

]]> By: Kyle Floyd http://blog.camfrog.com/2008/04/30/50-video-window-size-screen-space/comment-page-1/#comment-57 Kyle Floyd Thu, 01 May 2008 05:52:46 +0000 http://blog.camfrog.com/?p=15#comment-57 Right, but problem is Classic STILL leaves the windows huge. You could also re-add the "small" option in there. It'd be nice if you'd let us -downgrade.- Right, but problem is Classic STILL leaves the windows huge. You could also re-add the “small” option in there.

It’d be nice if you’d let us -downgrade.-

]]>